Annals Of The American Thoracic Society

Aus Weinlager
Version vom 26. November 2025, 13:35 Uhr von BeatrizFergerson (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<br>Outlets like American Conservative Movement, Tech Startups, and Gateway Pundit promoted the article by publishing several articles like this one, this one,…“)
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)


Outlets like American Conservative Movement, Tech Startups, and Gateway Pundit promoted the article by publishing several articles like this one, this one, and this one which went viral on social media in April 2021, altogether receiving more than 50,000 interactions on Facebook. The articles revealed by American Conservative Movement and Gateway Pundit claimed that the study was carried out by Stanford University and had been printed on the web site of the U.S. National Center for Biotechnological Information (NCBI), which is a part of the U.S. National Institutes for Health (NIH). However, the declare is inaccurate. The article by Vainshelboim was printed in the journal Medical Hypotheses, BloodVitals SPO2 which belongs to the publishing company Elsevier. The NCBI’s inclusion of the article in its on-line repository PubMed is akin to stocking a guide in a library. It doesn’t mean that Vainshelboim’s article was printed by, requested, funded or in any method related to the NIH, as claimed.



Secondly, Vainshelboim’s declare to be affiliated with Stanford University, particularly with the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System was refuted by Stanford University. The truth is, the university lately declared in a statement to Associated Press that Vainshelboim was by no means employed by the university and has no present contractual relationship by any means with Stanford University. In the Medical Hypotheses article, Vainshelboim put ahead two statements relating to using face masks: that they don’t cease the unfold of a virus and that they've a collection of dangerous results on well being. However, the present evidence doesn’t assist both of those hypotheses, opposite to what Vainshelboim claimed. On this review we present that these hypotheses are unfounded. This claim relies on the next reasoning: "SARS-CoV-2’s diameter is 1000 times smaller than the thread diameter of non-medical facemasks", so "SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass by means of any facemask". However, this reasoning is essentially flawed.



These droplets are divided into two groups depending on their dimension, giant droplets (greater than 5 micrometers in diameter) that fall quickly to the ground and are thus transmitted only over quick distances, and small droplets (lower than or equal to 5 micrometers in diameter) that stay suspended in air for longer intervals of time and will be inhaled, forming a small cloud often called aerosol. Therefore, even if the particle measurement is smaller than the gaps within the masks, the masks are in a position to remove most of those small particles from the air. Several studies help the effectiveness of masks in filtering aerosols. This efficacy is even better when medical-grade masks are used. Evidence also reveals that using face masks prevents transmission of COVID-19, especially if this measure is accompanied by others resembling frequent hand-washing and bodily distancing. Lastly, here is a listing of peer-reviewed scientific studies on the efficacy of face masks in stopping COVID-19 transmission.



The outcomes show overwhelming proof that wearing a face mask reduces the danger of being uncovered to the SARS CoV2 virus, and of transmitting the virus to others, if contaminated. The Medical Hypotheses article also claimed that using face masks altered the concentration of respiratory gases in the blood, inflicting hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Hypoxemia consists of a deficit in the amount of oxygen current within the blood, while hypercapnia consists of an abnormally high focus of carbon dioxide within the blood. The article listed a lot of medical circumstances produced by hypoxemia and hypercapnia. This claim was debunked on several occasions (see right here, right here, and here). Face masks are bodily incapable of preventing gasoline molecules from passing via them, as fuel molecules are many occasions smaller than the filter dimension of even an N95 mask, and contrary to the virus, BloodVitals SPO2 gasoline molecules do not journey in droplets. Wearing face masks for long periods of time can enhance the temperature and humidity of the mask itself, which can trigger discomfort or anxiety for some people.